Tuesday, March 9, 2010

The Irascibles -- Rebels With A Cause:
In May 1950, a group of New York artists -- all pioneers in the Abstract Expressionist movement -- joined together briefly to write a letter to the director and associate curator of American Art at the Metropolitan Museum of Art. In the letter, Adolph Gottlieb, Jackson Pollock, Mark Rothko, Robert Motherwell, and fourteen of their colleagues denounced the Metropolitan’s contempt for modern painting and declared their intention to boycott the museum’s planned juried exhibition, American Art Today.

The eighteen signatories of the protest letter came to be known as "The Irascibles."

The above photograph was taken by Nina Leen, and appeared in Life magazine. This very famous photo, known as the photo of "The Irascibles " shows 15 of the 18 Abstract Expressionist painters: Jackson Pollock (1912-1956); Barnett Newman (1905-1970); Willem De Kooning (1904-1997); Clyfford Still ( 1904-1980); Adolph Gottlieb (1903-1974); Ad Reinhardt (1913-1967); Robert Motherwell (1915-1991); Mark Rothko ( 1903-1970); William Baziotes (1912-1963); James Brooks (1906-1992); Jimmy Ernst (1920-1984); Theodoros Stamos (1922-1997); Bradley Walker Tomlin (1899-1953); and Richard Poussette-Dart (1916-1992).

The photograph caption read: "IRASCIBLE GROUP OF ADVANCED ARTISTS LED FIGHT AGAINST SHOW -- The solemn people above, along with three others, made up the group of “irascible” artists who raised the biggest fuss about the Metropolitan’s competition (following pages). All representatives of advanced art, they paint in styles which vary from the dribblings of Pollock (LIFE, Aug. 8, 1949) to the Cyclopean phantoms of Baziotes, and all have distrusted the museum since its director likened them to “flat-chested” pelicans “strutting upon the intellectual wastelands.” From left, rear, they are: Willem de Kooning, Adolph Gottlieb, Ad Reinhardt, Hedda Sterne; (next row) Richard Pousette-Dart, William Baziotes, Jimmy Ernst (with bow tie), Jackson Pollock (in striped jacket), James Brooks, Clyfford Still (leaning on knee), Robert Motherwell, Bradley Walker Tomlin; (in foreground) Theodoros Stamos (on bench), Barnett Newman (on stool), Mark Rothko (with glasses). Their revolt and subsequent boycott of the show was in keeping with an old tradition among avant-garde artists. French painters in 1874 rebelled against their official juries and held the first impressionist exhibition. U.S. artists in 1908 broke with the National Academy jury to launch the famous Ashcan School. The effect of the revolt of the “irascible” remains to be seen, but it did appear to have needled the Metropolitan’s juries into turning more than half the show into a free-for-all of modern art."

Someone told me that originally there were only men in the group, but the photographer insisted on having a woman as well, and Hedda Sterne (who throughout her career maintained a stubborn independence from styles and trends) was brought in for the photo shoot, even though she wasn't one of the signers of the letter to the Met.
(definition of irascible -- easily angered; irratible)

2 comments:

  1. Actually, Hedda Sterne was an active participant in the artist round table that preceded the signing of the letter (Artists' Session at Studio 35). She definitely signed the letter to the Metropolitan.

    You can find a transcript of the Artists' Session at Studio 35 in Modern Artists in America, edited by Robert Motherwell and Ad Reinhardt and published by Wittenborn Schultz in 1951.

    There is also more information about the Irascibles photograph in Bradford Collins' article, "Life Magazine and the Abstract Expressionists, 1948-51: A Historiographic Study of A Late Bohemian Enterprise," Art Bulletin 73 (June 1991): 283-308.

    While she would not have described herself as an Abstract Expressionist she was definitely a close colleague of the men shown in the Irascibles photograph and showed regularly at the Betty Parsons Gallery in New York which also represented Barnett Newman, Jackson Pollock, Clyfford Still, and Theodore Stamos as well as others in the photograph.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Thanks for that correction, Sarah... (L. Eckhardt?) I was wrong, and I should've checked my facts further. I did know she was at the meeting of the 45 artists when the letter was conceived, but read (or was told) that she wasn't one of the actual signers (I believe there were about 6 scupltors who signed as well.) I will definitely update this and give Hedda her due!

    ReplyDelete